Talking bollocks thread #4

No, I don't care about your rules if someone provokes me.
And what is unclear to you?

You don't need to care about the rules, just like you don't need to believe in gravity, what I would like to make clear to you is it is my job to enforce those rules and you have been warned before and fully understand the rules so you have no excuse when you break them again for me banning you for it.

If you don't care about that then there is no problem at all. If you do care about being able to post here then follow the rules.

You don't have to like them or agree with them.

You do your way, while I will do mine. How do you get the right to call me "hot headed nature", even though I am timid ?!

So now you are timid. The definition of timid is someone that does not respond to attacks or abuse.

You refer to "other members", i.e. Regular, Firebird and the like with whom I have been in discussion from the beginning.
Have a little more dignity, you are the main administrator after all.

When I tell other members to behave within the rules they normally comply even if they don't agree.

There are many who don't like to do as they are told, and lets be honest, I could easily abuse my power and just ban people who annoy me even for the slightest reason, but I try to make bans a last resort when I am not getting through.

There are not any people on this forum I don't actually like or cannot agree about anything with them. I don't enjoy banning people because I have been banned plenty of times on plenty of western controlled websites for pathetic reasons too.

The rules are pretty clear and simple, if someone abuses you then you report them to me or George1, if you want to respond in kind or choose to start the abuse as preemptive self defence then there is a good chance that the people getting a time out will include you.

Some people who don't like you might even exploit that and get you wound up on purpose.

The Democrats did that to Donald Trump with all their Russiagate and Putins Puppet bullshit and they succeeded in breaking relations between Russia and the US worse than they had been before under Obama. DT didn't realised he had been played but the Democrats were overjoyed because they wanted bad relations with Russia and China and Iran because it is good for the arms industry and then Biden gets in and a war starts...

But by all means do as you please, I can't stop you from behaving as you please, but if you break the rules I can and will stop you posting.

I have no problem even writing to you that you are my enemy after what you wrote when you blocked me for 3 months. What are you, the Gestapo, to hand out blockades as you like ?

See, you learned the wrong lesson... if I was your enemy why would I make it 3 months when I could just as easily have made it a permanent ban then and saved myself this discussion?

Moving this stuff to talking bollocks shortly.

And as for Firebird, I didn't call him the first, he called me. I can't stand that person. I also blocked him a long time ago, but every time I see his message when I log out... And what now, should I be silent because of the "rules"?

If you and everyone else read the rules you will see that it says you are not to abuse other members. It does not say the first to post abuse gets the punishment and everyone else gets a free card to abuse back with no problems.

reporting what the headline says, the simple fact is he served in the NAF and he was a elected MP, so Hindustan news refers all politicians as aides

That might be why most western media think Putin has Aids.

Refuelling would be scheduled to happen during a major overhaul which very large ships periodically go through anyway... not a huge deal.

Probably every 5 years you are going to look at your major ships and examine any new threats or new technology that might be incorporated into the design that was not previously considered or not previously possible and think about adding these changes during the next major overhaul.

I remember a while back seeing a video about a Russian invention for buses, and the core problem it was trying to help with is that a bus is a big heavy vehicle that uses lots of power to accelerate and also to slow down, but a bus in an urban environment is stopping and starting all the time, which is incredibly inefficient in terms of fuel consumption and energy use... you burn extra fuel to accelerate and then might get a red light and lose all that power when you put on your brakes to stop, or use brakes to slow down to turn corners or pick up passengers or drop them off.

They came up with an enormously heavy wheel inside the bus. When you accelerated the power from the motor went to the wheels, but when you had to slow down or even stop then part of the energy was lost in the brakes but a lot of the energy... the forward momentum of the bus was transferred to the wheel by spinning it up... every time you stopped the bus you transferred momentum to that spinning wheel so when you started off again you used the engine but you could also use energy from the spinning wheel mass which meant you used less fuel... you used the engine less and you could use the captured energy in the wheel to accelerate the bus. Sometimes the traffic is congested so you don't pull out from the side of the road and accelerate away, you just join the traffic so you might only move a few metres so you might just use a bit of energy from the spinning wheel and not blast the cars around you with a huge cloud of diesel smoke.

The point is that adding a momentum wheel to a helicopter carrier or an existing carrier would be relatively cheap and simple... the system is not super complex with high energy steam systems or super magnets... it likely wont allow a helicopter carrier to operate MiGs or Sukhois but it might make heavy drone operation possible, while for the Kuznetsov it might allow heavier loads to be carried from the shorter takeoff points meaning more fuel for better flight range or perhaps a heavy air launched anti ship missile could be added to the weapon options.

After the SMO experience I am sure they will take air defence even more seriously and beef that up for all ships they operate...

I remember a western expert explaining why the short hours of Russian planes and engines was never a problem they thought needed fixing... he first of all mentioned that Soviet and Russian aircraft tend to operate from fairly rough airfields that are not walked three times a day looking for foreign objects that could be ingested and damage an expensive engine, they design their aircraft for war which means during a war they are almost zero maintenance unless they get damaged so fuel and lubricants and a pilot and weapons and off it goes to combat. A 1,000 hours between overhauls is meaningless because between those overhauls the checks and tests are minimal and most of the parts will really last 3,000 hours but are replaced at 1,000 hours because it is simpler and cheaper because you don't need to examine for micro cracks or take the aircraft to pieces to examine it. The western expert basically said the Soviet and Russian aircraft are designed to be rugged and are designed to be useful in war time, which made them a little expensive in peace time because engines were replaced more often and early on those engines were cheap but that didn't matter but later on they became more expensive and it started to become and issue... but now of course they have the diagnostic systems and other support features western aircraft have, but they still manage to be cheaper because their MIC is not profit driven.

So you end up with a Russian tank that does rather well in combat, while the first model Abrams tanks need to have their filters cleaned twice a day in operation or you destroy the engines, which are very very expensive and not located under the engine trees that Kiev grows in its garden... the proximity of the Jungle effects its growth.

wilhelm wrote:Will no one spare a thought for poor owais.usmani?

The poor dear....a duplicate account does nothing but "Like" his own alternate account shite.

An echo chamber bubble.

When pure rubbish is posted, an absolute guarantee is that owais.usmani posts a "like" seconds later.

Laughable unsophisticated rubbish.

Now, now, that's just not fair.  You only give him credit for a fourth of what he does.  He also "dislikes" posts when a poster calls out a Ukronazi fanboy for posting propaganda bullcrap.  He has a penchant for clicking "dislike" on any post that calls a Ukronazi a Ukronazi, and last and certainly least, he can click "dislike" like a bat out of hell when someone hypothesizes that the gloom parade is a bit unwarranted.  He is either a below average bot, or he is just a dimwit who  "has the brain of a four year old boy, and I bet he was glad to get rid of it."  Show him some respect

kvs wrote:Do we have any actual confirmation of Mig-31K losses at Belbeck?  Satellite photos are not sufficient evidence.   Maybe satellite video but that is not
a thing.  

As for Europe's economic future, the clowns appointed as managers of that US colony are not showing any signs of disobeying their boss.   For example,
Scholz and his bleating about how Russia cut off the gas supply to U-rope.   This is a bald faced lie and he is repeating it in the spirit of Goebbels.   If
these EU "leaders" wanted to maintain the economy and look out for their citizens, then they would have forced Minsk down the throat of the Kiev
regime.  Instead they are actually now yapping about needing to fight a war against Russia to stop its alleged plans to invade and dominate the EU.

I wonder if these whores in Uncle Swineshit's employ understand that any such war will not let them escape to a peaceful, rich life on a tropical island,
but instead will most like result in vapourization or burial under thousands of tons of concrete and earth?   They may even get offed before this.

No just Ukrainian social media claims, we all know how reliable those are, and the confirmation of vimple, pimple, ass dimple becuse he has been on the internet since his computer fell on his head in 2013 and he says he knows Garry. . . . Also Karla Huerfureinpfennig pronounced gloom, Arrow made notice that the Ukwehrmacht had new wonderwaffles from Eggo, a couple doomers emerged from their bunkers to announce the fall of Moscow and Osawatomie went on a dislike massacre so it checks out in the same way a guy's story that he has no idea where it came from when his girlfriend finds the pr0n on his computer.

Vympel wrote:

ucmvulcan wrote:
No just Ukrainian social media claims, we all know how reliable those are, and the confirmation of vimple, pimple, ass dimple becuse he has been on the internet since his computer fell on his head in 2013 and he says he knows Garry. . . . Also Karla Huerfureinpfennig pronounced gloom, Arrow made notice that the Ukwehrmacht had new wonderwaffles from Eggo, a couple doomers emerged from their bunkers to announce the fall of Moscow and Osawatomie went on a dislike massacre so it checks out in the same way a guy's story that he has no idea where it came from when his girlfriend finds the pr0n on his computer.

Do you add any informational value or do you just post this endless word salad vomit because you're still malding over your dumb cope being rubbished literally days later?

Simplicius' narrative is based off the same lies Lord Bebo was spreading - posting decade old photos of when the airfield had just been taken off of Ukrainian hands in 2014 and presenting them as if they're indicative of its status in 2024. It's highly dishonest to not acknowledge that, and should be dismissed out of hand on that basis alone, but for the dumbass corner of this war's internet (read: you, and every idiot who thinks lke you) that doesn't matter, you just want to be told comforting fables about Russian success.

It's such a stupid argument it beggars belief - he shows a photo from October 2023 where the MiG-31s are clearly in a different position than they were when they were destroyed, and somehow launders that into claiming that this must mean they were decoys. If you think about this for more than two seconds, that means there is literally no possible satellite photo he could be shown that would prove to him they were active aircraft. If they were in the same place as they were pictured in October 2023 (again, less than a year ago) he'd say that proves they were decoys as well. His argument is therefore unfalsifiable.

Like I said before, you have the same copium infused brainworms that the Ukronazis you so decry have. No difference between you and them at all. Identical. Just making up stories to yourself to feel good and throwing your toys out of the pram like the giant, mewling baby you are when they're debunked.

uh before you ask about others, tell us what is it exactly that you do except insult posters and post Ukrotrash? What of "informational value" do you provide except ukro war porn and copium?