Russia - Iraq bilateral cooperation

Does that mean that US will stop bombing Syrian and Iraqi resistance against ISIS? They never bombed ISIS everyone knows that, if US wants to destroy something they do it with lot of collateral damage, but they haven't done anything else but to pave the way for ISIS into Syria and have done absolutley nothing in Iraq, columns with thousands of ISIS terrorists could ride into Iraq without a single shot fired, but almost no civilian survived trying to flee from Bagdad as the muh-ricans have bombarded the roads leaving Bagdad which is very famous today which just shows US cynism in the world.

Walther von Oldenburg wrote:What resistance? Are they bombing Syrian army or what?

If yes - show us proof. Maybe some official info from SANA, Press TV etc. Like I said before, if USA is bombing Assad, Assad has no f... business in hiding it from the world. Israelis did some bombings mostly agaisnt Hezbollah but there were only a few of them and casualties casued by them mean nothing in strategic or even operational sclae.

How about first factual evidence that US bombed ISIS, with factual evidence of the dead not some black and white footage of destroyed Toyota pickups which US bought in tenthousands for ISIS themselfs. Factual evidence of bombing against ISIS shown and proven to be in ISIS not some garbage video with just a title and old footage from some other place which the west constantly uses.


http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-bombs-syrian-oil-refineries-to-prevent-assad-from-retaking-them/5404808

http://topwar.ru/59055-ssha-bombyat-siriyskaya-armiya-osvobozhdaet.html

yandex translated
In any case, Syria, of course, the damage from American air strikes, even if they are directed against terrorists. Suffer buildings, oil fields, infrastructure. After a while, after the inevitable victory, the Syrian people will restore everything that was destroyed by the terrorists, and that defeated the Tomahawks.

I find it funny that you come up with such garbage when it is so obvious especially since ISIS was financed and created by the very same countries that are the first to announce air strikes against ISIS, Turkey, Israel, US, Saudis, UAE and every shit of this countries has only attacked what targets they wanted. The turks have attacked PKK kurds, the Israelis have attacked Syria the US has attacked infrastructure almost Serbian style, Sauds and UAE have attacked whatever but ISIS. Not a little suspicious that the biggest Terror supporting countries which till this day unbroken and unholded have supported and are supporting Terror groups such as ISIS,FSA,Al-CIAda,Al-Nusra,Taliban etc all the same terrorists under different names to create an "Islamic threat" in the mindest of stupid westerners like you.

Very suspicious that the trouble makers are coming forth to be the saviors from their own created terrorism. Mafia style 101. Use a brain.

George1 wrote:Baghdad Information Center between Russia, Syria, Iraq and Iran although not a military alliance it reminds me 1955-1979 Baghdad Pact (CENTO) between UK, Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Pakistan

Russia increases its influence in southwestern countries near its frontier

and turkey feels a bit "surrounded" ?

One of the Shia religious authorities in Najaf Sheikh Oday Al Asam threatened the Iraqi PM haider al abadi with besieging the "green zone" in Baghdad if he does not allow the Russian Air Force to bomb Daesh.

This now puts Abadi in a very difficult spot stuck between the US and the increasingly pro-russian Iraqi armed forces, PMU and population.

sheytanelkebir wrote:One of the Shia religious authorities in Najaf Sheikh Oday Al Asam threatened the Iraqi PM haider al abadi with besieging the "green zone" in Baghdad if he does not allow the Russian Air Force to bomb Daesh.

This now puts Abadi in a very difficult spot stuck between the US and the increasingly pro-russian Iraqi armed forces, PMU and population.

If this goes beyond words then it's only going to harm Iraq. The political words can all pressure the US into upping support for Iraq but if some actually attempt to besiege Baghdad it'll only force more Iraqi forces to secure the capital instead of fighting IS. Like the group that struck Ashraf camp.

Iraq to coordinate its counter-terrorist efforts with Russia — Russian Foreign Ministry

Whether before or after IS is defeated in Iraq, it seems like Iraq will eventually get a closer alliance with Russia, US cannot be trusted. Iraq's parliament is divided, many prefer replacing US with Russia. Only the cabinet ruling power has not yet formally asked Russia. A lot of it will depend on Syrian army/Russian success in Syria.

iraqidabab wrote:Iraq to coordinate its counter-terrorist efforts with Russia — Russian Foreign Ministry

Whether before or after IS is defeated in Iraq, it seems like Iraq will eventually get a closer alliance with Russia, US cannot be trusted. Iraq's parliament is divided, many prefer replacing US with Russia. Only the cabinet ruling power has not yet formally asked Russia. A lot of it will depend on Syrian army/Russian success in Syria.

More strategic successes from American Foreign policy.

KoTeMoRe wrote:

iraqidabab wrote:Iraq to coordinate its counter-terrorist efforts with Russia — Russian Foreign Ministry

Whether before or after IS is defeated in Iraq, it seems like Iraq will eventually get a closer alliance with Russia, US cannot be trusted. Iraq's parliament is divided, many prefer replacing US with Russia. Only the cabinet ruling power has not yet formally asked Russia. A lot of it will depend on Syrian army/Russian success in Syria.

More strategic successes from American Foreign policy.

The US through overuse of unhelpful black and white narratives have got themselves in a position where they have a tough choice between supporting Sunnis or Shia, which means either an uncomfortable alliance with either Al-Qaeda (de facto) or Iran/Hezbollah (de facto). Fortunately Russia is more pragmatic and cleaning up the mess caused by neoliberal delusions of grandeur.

Russian Technicians working in Taji Army Aviation MRO facility.

http://iraqimilitary.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=43&t=1700&start=390

seems they're having a look around Iraq's "western" types.

The way for Russia or any regional state, is to help the development of national economy of these broken and divided countries. The key to national development, is having an investment and industrial strategy that has a strong social and political element. This policy allows for growth in ethnically diverse border areas. By employment of diverse groups. And allows for capital investment by various ethnic groups in joint ventures. Towns will grow in places where there were none. People will intermarry. No longer will there be Shia villages or Sunni villages. Where people lived separate lives. Children will speak both languages of their parents.